Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GPGIX
CSPAX vs GPGIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GPGIX
CSPAX vs GPGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GPGIX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and GPGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GPGIX (348M). GPGIX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: GPGIX (0.94) vs CSPAX (0.60). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GPGIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GPGIX (15 years). GPGIX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GPGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGIX: CSPAX (250) vs GPGIX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. GPGIX (7.97). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -7.10 vs. GPGIX (-32.66).
| CSPAX | GPGIX | CSPAX / GPGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.34 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.332 | 10.795 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 348M | 27,098% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.94 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 7.97 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.34 | 10.64 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.10 | -32.66 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.33 | 28.46 | 282% |