Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs GPGIX
CSPAX vs GPGIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs GPGIX
CSPAX vs GPGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. GPGIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and GPGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. GPGIX (352M). GPGIX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: GPGIX (0.93) vs CSPAX (0.62). CSPAX was incepted earlier than GPGIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs GPGIX (15 years). GPGIX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). GPGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGIX: CSPAX (250) vs GPGIX (1000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.72 vs. GPGIX (11.89). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.32 vs. GPGIX (-29.98).
| CSPAX | GPGIX | CSPAX / GPGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.34 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.817 | 11.364 | 148% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 352M | 25,994% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.93 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.72 | 11.89 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | 15.00 | 284% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.32 | -29.98 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.26 | 39.25 | 266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement