Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXAX
CSPAX vs HGXAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXAX
CSPAX vs HGXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. HGXAX (347M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXAX: CSPAX (0.59) vs HGXAX (0.20). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXAX: CSPAX (25 years) vs HGXAX (10 years). HGXAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). HGXAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. HGXAX (7.79). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.96 vs. CSPAX (-9.59).
| CSPAX | HGXAX | CSPAX / HGXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.19 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.19 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.262 | 12.715 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 347M | 26,340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.20 | 291% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | 7.79 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.25 | 48.33 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.59 | 10.96 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers