Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXAX
CSPAX vs HGXAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXAX
CSPAX vs HGXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXAX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. HGXAX (357M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXAX: CSPAX (0.62) vs HGXAX (0.21). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXAX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXAX (9 years). HGXAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). HGXAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.31 vs. HGXAX (15.93). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.33 vs. CSPAX (-0.32).
| CSPAX | HGXAX | CSPAX / HGXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.19 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.19 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.845 | 12.775 | 124% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 357M | 25,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.21 | 299% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.31 | 15.93 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.02 | 39.88 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.32 | 17.33 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement