Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXAX
CSPAX vs HGXAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXAX
CSPAX vs HGXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and HGXAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. HGXAX (358M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXAX: CSPAX (0.60) vs HGXAX (0.20). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXAX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXAX (9 years). HGXAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). HGXAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). HGXAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXAX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXAX (2000). HGXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.65 vs. CSPAX (12.68). HGXAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.24 vs. CSPAX (-7.10).
| CSPAX | HGXAX | CSPAX / HGXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.19 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.19 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.332 | 14.320 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 358M | 26,341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.20 | 295% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 14.65 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.34 | 39.39 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.10 | 15.24 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement