Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXCX
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXCX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.98
Change+$0.53 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.82B
Hartford Global Impact C
Price$16.75
Change+$0.14 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.13M
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and HGXCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. HGXCX (321M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: CSPAX (0.56) vs HGXCX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXCX (9 years). HGXCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). CSPAX (11.50) and HGXCX (11.22) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.73 vs. CSPAX (16.72).
| CSPAX | HGXCX | CSPAX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.94 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.99 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.873 | 12.040 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8B | 321M | 25,171% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.50 | 11.22 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.72 | 36.73 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.72 | 36.73 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.82 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement