Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXCX
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXCX
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXCX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. HGXCX (357M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: CSPAX (0.62) vs HGXCX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXCX (9 years). HGXCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.72 vs. HGXCX (15.33). HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.24 vs. CSPAX (-1.32).
| CSPAX | HGXCX | CSPAX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.94 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.98 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.817 | 12.407 | 136% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 357M | 25,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.72 | 15.33 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | 41.82 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.32 | 11.24 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement