Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXCX
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXCX
CSPAX vs HGXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a StrongBuy and HGXCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. HGXCX (360M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXCX: CSPAX (0.57) vs HGXCX (0.00). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXCX (9 years). HGXCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). HGXCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXCX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXCX (2000). HGXCX (14.06) and CSPAX (13.71) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.84 vs. CSPAX (-4.37).
| CSPAX | HGXCX | CSPAX / HGXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.94 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.98 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.012 | 13.704 | 88% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 360M | 26,194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.71 | 14.06 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.83 | 37.46 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.37 | 11.84 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.68 | N/A | - |