Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXFX
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXFX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$73.78
Change+$0.20 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.76B
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$17.41
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.69M
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXFX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and HGXFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 80.8B vs. HGXFX (313M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXFX (1.09) vs CSPAX (0.58). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXFX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXFX (9 years). CSPAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.75). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.35 vs. CSPAX (9.67). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. CSPAX (13.63).
| CSPAX | HGXFX | CSPAX / HGXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.69 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.75 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.371 | 13.290 | 86% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 80.8B | 313M | 25,815% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | 11.35 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.69 | 38.81 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.63 | 41.33 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement