Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXFX
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXFX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$74.48
Change+$0.75 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.32B
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$17.51
Change+$0.12 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.93M
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. HGXFX (328M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXFX (1.05) vs CSPAX (0.56). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXFX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXFX (9 years). CSPAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.75). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. CSPAX (9.21). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.11 vs. CSPAX (9.27).
| CSPAX | HGXFX | CSPAX / HGXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.69 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.75 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.428 | 13.290 | 94% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.3B | 328M | 24,787% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.05 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 10.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.34 | 48.56 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.27 | 33.11 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers