Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXFX
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXFX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$71.83
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.39B
Hartford Global Impact F
Price$16.94
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.66M
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXFX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 79.4B vs. HGXFX (305M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXFX (1.09) vs CSPAX (0.58). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXFX: CSPAX (23 years) vs HGXFX (8 years). CSPAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.75). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.08 vs. CSPAX (12.56). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.69 vs. CSPAX (13.63).
| CSPAX | HGXFX | CSPAX / HGXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.69 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.75 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.427 | 10.489 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.4B | 305M | 26,033% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.56 | 15.08 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.89 | 30.93 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.63 | 40.69 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement