Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXFX
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXFX
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and HGXFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 88.9B vs. HGXFX (359M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXFX (0.66) vs CSPAX (0.62). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXFX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXFX (9 years). CSPAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.74). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.37 vs. HGXFX (16.58). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.69 vs. CSPAX (-3.23).
| CSPAX | HGXFX | CSPAX / HGXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.74 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.054 | 13.449 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.9B | 359M | 24,763% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.66 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.37 | 16.58 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | 47.49 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.23 | 20.69 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers