Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXFX
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXFX
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXFX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and HGXFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. HGXFX (349M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXFX (0.64) vs CSPAX (0.59). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXFX: CSPAX (25 years) vs HGXFX (10 years). CSPAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.74). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). CSPAX (12.85) and HGXFX (12.33) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.04 vs. CSPAX (-10.09).
| CSPAX | HGXFX | CSPAX / HGXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.74 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.234 | 14.704 | 90% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 349M | 25,501% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.64 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.85 | 12.33 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.67 | 48.45 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.09 | 13.04 | -77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement