Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXFX
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXFX
CSPAX vs HGXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXFX commentary
Aug 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. HGXFX (372M). HGXFX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXFX (0.65) vs CSPAX (0.60). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXFX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXFX (9 years). CSPAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HGXFX (0.74). HGXFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXFX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXFX (1000000). HGXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.37 vs. CSPAX (15.76). HGXFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.74 vs. CSPAX (-3.06).
| CSPAX | HGXFX | CSPAX / HGXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.74 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.345 | 19.366 | 84% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 372M | 23,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.65 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 17.37 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.46 | 52.88 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.06 | 21.74 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement