Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXIX
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXIX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$71.50
Change-$0.37 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
Hartford Global Impact I
Price$16.43
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.09M
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and HGXIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. HGXIX (313M). HGXIX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXIX (0.89) vs CSPAX (0.55). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXIX (9 years). CSPAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.87). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. CSPAX (32.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. HGXIX (5.53). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. CSPAX (1.73).
| CSPAX | HGXIX | CSPAX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.87 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.87 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.929 | 6.697 | 118% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.3B | 313M | 25,335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.89 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | 5.53 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 28.31 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.73 | 18.91 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.64 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers