Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXIX
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXIX
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXIX commentary
Aug 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. HGXIX (372M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXIX: CSPAX (0.60) vs HGXIX (0.47). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXIX (9 years). CSPAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.88). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). HGXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.11 vs. CSPAX (15.76). HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 20.57 vs. CSPAX (-3.06).
| CSPAX | HGXIX | CSPAX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.88 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.88 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.345 | 19.201 | 85% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 372M | 23,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.47 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.76 | 17.11 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.46 | 52.00 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.06 | 20.57 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement