Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXIX
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXIX
CSPAX vs HGXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXIX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. HGXIX (353M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXIX: CSPAX (0.59) vs HGXIX (0.47). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXIX: CSPAX (25 years) vs HGXIX (10 years). CSPAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HGXIX (0.88). HGXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGXIX: CSPAX (250) vs HGXIX (2000). CSPAX (12.58) and HGXIX (12.41) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXIX return over 5 years is better than : 13.12 vs. CSPAX (-9.43).
| CSPAX | HGXIX | CSPAX / HGXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.88 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.88 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.067 | 15.742 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 353M | 25,212% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.47 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.58 | 12.41 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.26 | 51.75 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.43 | 13.12 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement