Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXRX
CSPAX vs HGXRX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXRX
CSPAX vs HGXRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXRX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. HGXRX (347M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXRX: CSPAX (0.59) vs HGXRX (0.01). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXRX: CSPAX (25 years) vs HGXRX (10 years). HGXRX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). HGXRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). HGXRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: HGXRX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. HGXRX (7.46). HGXRX return over 5 years is better than : 9.61 vs. CSPAX (-9.59).
| CSPAX | HGXRX | CSPAX / HGXRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.41 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.45 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.262 | 12.455 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 347M | 26,340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.01 | 5,720% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | 7.46 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.25 | 47.23 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.59 | 9.61 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement