Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXSX
CSPAX vs HGXSX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXSX
CSPAX vs HGXSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. HGXSX (359M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXSX: CSPAX (0.62) vs HGXSX (0.28). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXSX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXSX (9 years). HGXSX (1.15) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). HGXSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). HGXSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: HGXSX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.72 vs. HGXSX (16.21). HGXSX return over 5 years is better than : 15.95 vs. CSPAX (-1.32).
| CSPAX | HGXSX | CSPAX / HGXSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.11 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.15 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.817 | 12.813 | 131% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 359M | 25,487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.28 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.72 | 16.21 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | 45.25 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.32 | 15.95 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement