Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXSX
CSPAX vs HGXSX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXSX
CSPAX vs HGXSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and HGXSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. HGXSX (362M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXSX: CSPAX (0.60) vs HGXSX (0.28). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXSX: CSPAX (25 years) vs HGXSX (9 years). HGXSX (1.15) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). HGXSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). HGXSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: HGXSX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX (15.10) and HGXSX (15.05) have marching annual gain over last year. HGXSX return over 5 years is better than : 17.46 vs. CSPAX (-2.97).
| CSPAX | HGXSX | CSPAX / HGXSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.11 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.15 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.567 | 16.806 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 362M | 24,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.28 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.10 | 15.05 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.37 | 53.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.97 | 17.46 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement