Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXSX
CSPAX vs HGXSX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXSX
CSPAX vs HGXSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXSX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. HGXSX (347M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXSX: CSPAX (0.59) vs HGXSX (0.27). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXSX: CSPAX (25 years) vs HGXSX (10 years). HGXSX (1.15) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). HGXSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). HGXSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: HGXSX (0) vs CSPAX (250). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. HGXSX (7.84). HGXSX return over 5 years is better than : 11.31 vs. CSPAX (-9.59).
| CSPAX | HGXSX | CSPAX / HGXSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.11 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.15 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.262 | 12.753 | 96% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 347M | 26,340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.27 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | 7.84 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.25 | 48.65 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.59 | 11.31 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement