Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXTX
CSPAX vs HGXTX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXTX
CSPAX vs HGXTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXTX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and HGXTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. HGXTX (374M). CSPAX pays higher dividends than HGXTX: CSPAX (0.60) vs HGXTX (0.55). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXTX: CSPAX (25 years) vs HGXTX (9 years). CSPAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HGXTX (0.85). HGXTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). HGXTX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: HGXTX (0) vs CSPAX (250). HGXTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.54 vs. CSPAX (16.72). HGXTX return over 5 years is better than : 22.03 vs. CSPAX (-2.31).
| CSPAX | HGXTX | CSPAX / HGXTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.81 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.85 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.248 | 20.289 | 85% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 374M | 23,797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.55 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.72 | 18.54 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.09 | 55.79 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.31 | 22.03 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.35 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement