Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs HGXVX
CSPAX vs HGXVX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs HGXVX
CSPAX vs HGXVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. HGXVX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and HGXVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. HGXVX (358M). HGXVX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: HGXVX (0.65) vs CSPAX (0.60). CSPAX was incepted earlier than HGXVX: CSPAX (24 years) vs HGXVX (9 years). CSPAX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HGXVX (0.74). HGXVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CSPAX (41.00). HGXVX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSPAX: HGXVX (0) vs CSPAX (250). HGXVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.21 vs. CSPAX (12.68). HGXVX return over 5 years is better than : 18.11 vs. CSPAX (-7.10).
| CSPAX | HGXVX | CSPAX / HGXVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.74 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.332 | 14.639 | 71% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 358M | 26,341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.65 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | 15.21 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.34 | 41.41 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.10 | 18.11 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement