Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs LPFAX
CSPAX vs LPFAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs LPFAX
CSPAX vs LPFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. LPFAX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and LPFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. LPFAX (45M). LPFAX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: LPFAX (5.27) vs CSPAX (0.59). CSPAX was incepted earlier than LPFAX: CSPAX (25 years) vs LPFAX (8 years). LPFAX (2.02) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPFAX (31.00). CSPAX initial investment is less costly to investors than LPFAX (3%) vs LPFAX (3%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFAX: CSPAX (250) vs LPFAX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.76 vs. LPFAX (-12.07). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -10.96 vs. LPFAX (-13.01).
| CSPAX | LPFAX | CSPAX / LPFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.02 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.02 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.915 | -0.532 | -2,240% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 108% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 45M | 197,778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 5.27 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | -12.07 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.10 | 16.41 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.96 | -13.01 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers