Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs LPFCX
CSPAX vs LPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs LPFCX
CSPAX vs LPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. LPFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and LPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. LPFCX (43.1M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: LPFCX (6.51) vs CSPAX (0.62). CSPAX was incepted earlier than LPFCX: CSPAX (24 years) vs LPFCX (16 years). LPFCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPFCX (31.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: CSPAX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.72 vs. LPFCX (-14.88). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.32 vs. LPFCX (-17.75).
| CSPAX | LPFCX | CSPAX / LPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.62 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.71 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.817 | -7.312 | -230% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 43.1M | 212,297% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 6.51 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.72 | -14.88 | -159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | 9.88 | 431% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.32 | -17.75 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.26 | 39.68 | 263% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers