Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs LPFCX
CSPAX vs LPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs LPFCX
CSPAX vs LPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. LPFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and LPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. LPFCX (45.1M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: LPFCX (6.43) vs CSPAX (0.60). CSPAX was incepted earlier than LPFCX: CSPAX (25 years) vs LPFCX (16 years). LPFCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPFCX (31.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: CSPAX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.10 vs. LPFCX (-13.15). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.97 vs. LPFCX (-15.47).
| CSPAX | LPFCX | CSPAX / LPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.62 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.71 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.567 | -0.860 | -1,693% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 45.1M | 197,339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 6.43 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.10 | -13.15 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.37 | 14.78 | 273% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.97 | -15.47 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.19 | 40.63 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers