Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs LPFCX
CSPAX vs LPFCX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs LPFCX
CSPAX vs LPFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. LPFCX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and LPFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. LPFCX (42.3M). LPFCX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: LPFCX (6.21) vs CSPAX (0.59). CSPAX was incepted earlier than LPFCX: CSPAX (25 years) vs LPFCX (16 years). LPFCX (2.71) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. LPFCX (31.00). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LPFCX: CSPAX (250) vs LPFCX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. LPFCX (-19.57). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -9.59 vs. LPFCX (-22.24).
| CSPAX | LPFCX | CSPAX / LPFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.62 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 2.71 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.262 | -6.237 | -197% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 42.3M | 216,076% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 6.21 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | -19.57 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.25 | 5.07 | 735% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.59 | -22.24 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.39 | 33.01 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers