Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs RGSAX
CSPAX vs RGSAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs RGSAX
American Funds SMALLCAP World 529A
Price$71.50
Change-$0.37 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.34B
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap A
Price$31.46
Change-$0.11 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.26M
CSPAX vs RGSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. RGSAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and RGSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 79.3B vs. RGSAX (38.3M). RGSAX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: RGSAX (1.13) vs CSPAX (0.55). CSPAX was incepted earlier than RGSAX: CSPAX (24 years) vs RGSAX (24 years). RGSAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.06). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSAX (25.00). RGSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSAX: CSPAX (250) vs RGSAX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. RGSAX (-13.45). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.73 vs. RGSAX (-28.06).
| CSPAX | RGSAX | CSPAX / RGSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.63 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.66 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.929 | -2.652 | -299% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.3B | 38.3M | 207,050% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.13 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | -13.45 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.01 | 11.38 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.73 | -28.06 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.64 | -25.82 | -215% |