Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs RGSAX
CSPAX vs RGSAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs RGSAX
CSPAX vs RGSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. RGSAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and RGSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. RGSAX (35.3M). RGSAX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: RGSAX (2.67) vs CSPAX (0.60). CSPAX was incepted earlier than RGSAX: CSPAX (25 years) vs RGSAX (25 years). RGSAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGSAX (25.00). RGSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSAX: CSPAX (250) vs RGSAX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.10 vs. RGSAX (-3.56). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.97 vs. RGSAX (-33.15).
| CSPAX | RGSAX | CSPAX / RGSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.63 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.66 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.567 | 7.409 | 197% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89B | 35.3M | 252,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 2.67 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.10 | -3.56 | -424% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.37 | 8.03 | 503% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.97 | -33.15 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.19 | -21.37 | -385% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement