Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs RGSAX
CSPAX vs RGSAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs RGSAX
CSPAX vs RGSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. RGSAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and RGSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. RGSAX (35.1M). RGSAX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: RGSAX (2.67) vs CSPAX (0.60). CSPAX was incepted earlier than RGSAX: CSPAX (24 years) vs RGSAX (25 years). RGSAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGSAX (25.00). RGSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSAX: CSPAX (250) vs RGSAX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.68 vs. RGSAX (-4.46). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -7.10 vs. RGSAX (-35.71).
| CSPAX | RGSAX | CSPAX / RGSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.63 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.66 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.332 | 5.729 | 180% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 35.1M | 268,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 2.67 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.68 | -4.46 | -284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.34 | 3.08 | 888% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.10 | -35.71 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.33 | -20.25 | -397% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers