Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs RGSAX
CSPAX vs RGSAX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs RGSAX
CSPAX vs RGSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. RGSAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Buy and RGSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. RGSAX (34.9M). RGSAX pays higher dividends than CSPAX: RGSAX (2.83) vs CSPAX (0.62). CSPAX was incepted earlier than RGSAX: CSPAX (24 years) vs RGSAX (24 years). RGSAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CSPAX (1.04). CSPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. RGSAX (25.00). RGSAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSPAX (4%) vs CSPAX (4%). CSPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSAX: CSPAX (250) vs RGSAX (2500). CSPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.00 vs. RGSAX (-7.25). CSPAX return over 5 years is better than : -4.25 vs. RGSAX (-38.49).
| CSPAX | RGSAX | CSPAX / RGSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.63 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.66 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.248 | 1.811 | 787% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 34.9M | 262,178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 2.83 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.00 | -7.25 | -276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.45 | 6.05 | 652% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.25 | -38.49 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.77 | -19.61 | -509% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement