Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPAX vs SCWFX
CSPAX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPAX vs SCWFX
CSPAX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPAX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPAX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSPAX (94.3B) and SCWFX (94.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CSPAX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: CSPAX (0.57) vs SCWFX (0.54). CSPAX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: CSPAX (24 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). SCWFX (1.07) and CSPAX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . CSPAX (41.00) and SCWFX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. CSPAX (250) and SCWFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSPAX (13.21) and SCWFX (13.19) have marching annual gain over last year. CSPAX (-5.49) and SCWFX (-5.56) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSPAX | SCWFX | CSPAX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.068 | 12.049 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 94.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.54 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.21 | 13.19 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 30.00 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.49 | -5.56 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.81 | 84.25 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement