Ad is loading...
CSPYX vs FTHFX
CSPYX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPYX vs FTHFX
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst3
Price$18.47
Change+$0.21 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.39B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.46
Change+$0.37 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.27B
CSPYX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPYX vs. FTHFX commentary
Apr 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPYX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.27B vs. CSPYX (2.39B). CSPYX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CSPYX (1.60) vs FTHFX (0.82). CSPYX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSPYX (8 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than CSPYX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CSPYX (29.00). CSPYX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.90 vs. CSPYX (-18.68). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 100.37 vs. CSPYX (22.93).
| CSPYX | FTHFX | CSPYX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.63 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.63 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.962 | -11.735 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 9.27B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.82 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.68 | -8.90 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.45 | 19.86 | -138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.93 | 100.37 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...