Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPYX vs FTHFX
CSPYX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPYX vs FTHFX
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst3
Price$21.81
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.66B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.82
Change-$0.16 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.19B
CSPYX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPYX vs. FTHFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPYX is a Buy and FTHFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. CSPYX (2.66B). CSPYX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CSPYX (1.53) vs FTHFX (0.74). CSPYX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSPYX (9 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than CSPYX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CSPYX (23.00). CSPYX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. CSPYX (-8.57). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.07 vs. CSPYX (13.29).
| CSPYX | FTHFX | CSPYX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.63 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.63 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.682 | 10.040 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.66B | 11.2B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.74 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.57 | 5.29 | -162% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.55 | 49.25 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.29 | 97.07 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 179.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement