Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPYX vs FTHFX
CSPYX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPYX vs FTHFX
Columbia Small Cap Index Inst3
Price$21.06
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.43B
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.60
Change+$0.02 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.79B
CSPYX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPYX vs. FTHFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPYX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. CSPYX (2.43B). CSPYX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CSPYX (1.44) vs FTHFX (0.70). CSPYX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSPYX (9 years) vs FTHFX (14 years). FTHFX (0.63) is less costly to investors than CSPYX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. CSPYX (23.00). CSPYX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.11 vs. CSPYX (-16.08). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 79.21 vs. CSPYX (-2.51).
| CSPYX | FTHFX | CSPYX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.63 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.63 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.093 | 6.957 | -59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 10.8B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.70 | 205% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.08 | -5.11 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.47 | 36.76 | -26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.51 | 79.21 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 159.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers