Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSPYX vs FTHFX
CSPYX vs FTHFX Comparison
Open Charts CSPYX vs FTHFX
CSPYX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSPYX vs. FTHFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSPYX is a Hold and FTHFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. CSPYX (2.67B). CSPYX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: CSPYX (1.13) vs FTHFX (0.56). CSPYX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: CSPYX (9 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FTHFX (0.64) is less costly to investors than CSPYX (0.20). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CSPYX (22.00). CSPYX (1000000) and FTHFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. CSPYX (14.05). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. CSPYX (-11.45).
| CSPYX | FTHFX | CSPYX / FTHFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.64 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.64 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.757 | 18.613 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 12.1B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.56 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.05 | 24.72 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.05 | 64.64 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.45 | 67.28 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 241.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement