Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQAX vs SRDBX
CSQAX vs SRDBX Comparison
Open Charts CSQAX vs SRDBX
CSQAX vs SRDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQAX vs. SRDBX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQAX is a Hold and SRDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRDBX pays higher dividends than CSQAX: SRDBX (7.64) vs CSQAX (1.30). CSQAX was incepted earlier than SRDBX: CSQAX (14 years) vs SRDBX (6 years). SRDBX (2.22) is less costly to investors than CSQAX (1.54). CSQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 458.00 vs. SRDBX (27.93). CSQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SRDBX: CSQAX (100) vs SRDBX (500000). SRDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. CSQAX (4.32). SRDBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.93 vs. CSQAX (10.10).
| CSQAX | SRDBX | CSQAX / SRDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 2.22 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 2.22 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.804 | 7.128 | 53% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 2.57B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 7.64 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 9.54 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.97 | 18.03 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.10 | 37.93 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement