Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs RSEBX
CSQCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs RSEBX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$9.56
Change+$0.05 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.5M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$67.34
Change+$0.44 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
CSQCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. CSQCX (21.5M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: CSQCX (0.89) vs RSEBX (0.21). CSQCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: CSQCX (23 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: RSEBX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.30 vs. CSQCX (-0.14). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 15.02 vs. CSQCX (-5.35).
| CSQCX | RSEBX | CSQCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.45 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 1.45 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.700 | 3.552 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.5M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 0.21 | 424% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.14 | 4.30 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.90 | 15.38 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.35 | 15.02 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.38 | 34.50 | -105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers