Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs RSEBX
CSQCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs RSEBX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$9.57
Change+$0.06 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.83M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$69.58
Change+$0.41 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.69B
CSQCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 77.7B vs. CSQCX (21.8M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: CSQCX (0.88) vs RSEBX (0.23). CSQCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: CSQCX (23 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: RSEBX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.82 vs. CSQCX (-5.27). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.68 vs. CSQCX (-4.32).
| CSQCX | RSEBX | CSQCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.45 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 1.45 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.700 | 7.035 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8M | 77.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.23 | 377% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.27 | 2.82 | -187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.54 | 31.94 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.32 | 14.68 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.08 | 36.85 | -98% |