Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSQCX vs RSLDX
CSQCX vs RSLDX Comparison
Open Charts CSQCX vs RSLDX
Calvert Global Small-Cap Equity C
Price$9.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.08M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5E
Price$73.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.11B
CSQCX vs RSLDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSQCX vs. RSLDX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSQCX is a Hold and RSLDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLDX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. CSQCX (21.1M). CSQCX pays higher dividends than RSLDX: CSQCX (0.90) vs RSLDX (0.81). CSQCX was incepted earlier than RSLDX: CSQCX (23 years) vs RSLDX (10 years). CSQCX (2.82) is less costly to investors than RSLDX (0.80). CSQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RSLDX (32.00). RSLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSQCX: RSLDX (250) vs CSQCX (1000). RSLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.18 vs. CSQCX (-1.50). RSLDX return over 5 years is better than : 14.82 vs. CSQCX (-9.30).
| CSQCX | RSLDX | CSQCX / RSLDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 0.80 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.82 | 0.80 | 352% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.512 | 8.259 | 18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.1M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.81 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.50 | 14.18 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.43 | 24.14 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.30 | 14.82 | -63% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement