Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSSPX vs MGLAX
CSSPX vs MGLAX Comparison
Open Charts CSSPX vs MGLAX
CSSPX vs MGLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSSPX vs. MGLAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSSPX is a Hold and MGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSSPX has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. MGLAX (2.17B). CSSPX pays higher dividends than MGLAX: CSSPX (3.10) vs MGLAX (2.64). CSSPX was incepted earlier than MGLAX: CSSPX (29 years) vs MGLAX (17 years). MGLAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CSSPX (0.93). CSSPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MGLAX (35.00). MGLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSSPX: MGLAX (1000) vs CSSPX (100000). CSSPX (12.35) and MGLAX (11.80) have marching annual gain over last year. CSSPX return over 5 years is better than : 8.15 vs. MGLAX (-9.21).
| CSSPX | MGLAX | CSSPX / MGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.18 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.19 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.614 | 10.834 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.38B | 2.17B | 109% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.10 | 2.64 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.35 | 11.80 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.35 | 24.35 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.15 | -9.21 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.58 | 31.95 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement