Advertisement
CSTUF vs GGAAF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSTUF is a Hold and GGAAF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSTUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGGAAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSTUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GGAAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSTUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CSTUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
CSTUF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GGAAF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +90.79%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSTUF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
GGAAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2022.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.88% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| CSTUF | GGAAF | CSTUF / GGAAF | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 69.1M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.702 | -15.674 | -4% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 135.14 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| CSTUF | GGAAF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 7% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 6% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 5% | 2 days ago 26% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 3% | 2 days ago 26% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 9% | N/A |
Advertisement
CSTUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSTUF and PORT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSTUF and PORT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSTUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSTUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PORT - CSTUF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MANDF - CSTUF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PORTU - CSTUF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GGAAF - CSTUF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QETAU - CSTUF | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GGAAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GGAAF and ACBD have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGAAF and ACBD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GGAAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GGAAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACBD - GGAAF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HYAC - GGAAF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
| NETD - GGAAF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.00% | ||
| ESHA - GGAAF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BOWN - GGAAF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||