Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure C
Price$25.37
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets994.35M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.60
Change+$0.05 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets352.95M
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Buy and RGFTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 994M vs. RGFTX (353M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (3.06) vs CSUCX (1.38). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (21 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). CSUCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.72 vs. CSUCX (3.11). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.89 vs. RGFTX (27.09).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.91 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.24 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.581 | 19.280 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 994M | 353M | 282% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 3.06 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | 13.72 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.06 | 48.74 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.89 | 27.09 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.21 | N/A | - |