Ad is loading...
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure C
Price$23.41
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets833.88M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$9.27
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.48M
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a StrongBuy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 834M vs. RGFTX (336M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (3.07) vs CSUCX (1.49). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). CSUCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.08 vs. CSUCX (8.56). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.66 vs. RGFTX (3.26).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.91 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.24 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.963 | 2.993 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 834M | 336M | 248% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 3.07 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.56 | 12.08 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.66 | 13.89 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.66 | 3.26 | 511% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers