Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure C
Price$24.15
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets935.44M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.04M
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. RGFTX (346M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (3.12) vs CSUCX (1.43). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). CSUCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.65 vs. CSUCX (-0.98). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.04 vs. RGFTX (24.70).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.91 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.24 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.383 | 15.922 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 935M | 346M | 270% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 3.12 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.98 | 11.65 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.37 | 27.31 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.04 | 24.70 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement