Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure C
Price$24.51
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets935.44M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.46
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.57M
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. RGFTX (352M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (3.17) vs CSUCX (1.44). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (21 years) vs RGFTX (8 years). CSUCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.86 vs. CSUCX (4.41). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.07 vs. RGFTX (24.51).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.91 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.24 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.969 | 17.385 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 935M | 352M | 266% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 3.17 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | 16.86 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.51 | 21.14 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.07 | 24.51 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers