Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure C
Price$25.13
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets970.84M
Russell Inv Global Infrastructure M
Price$10.55
Change+$0.08 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.22M
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a StrongBuy and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 971M vs. RGFTX (347M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (3.01) vs CSUCX (1.40). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). CSUCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.24). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. RGFTX (67.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.17 vs. CSUCX (1.20). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.88 vs. RGFTX (17.88).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.91 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.24 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.303 | 19.280 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 971M | 347M | 280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 3.01 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.20 | 11.17 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.48 | 30.55 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.88 | 17.88 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers