Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. RGFTX (584M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (2.68) vs CSUCX (1.00). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (22 years) vs RGFTX (10 years). CSUCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.41 vs. RGFTX (2.58). CSUCX (17.16) and RGFTX (17.07) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.91 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.22 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.396 | 5.646 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 584M | 194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 2.68 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | 2.58 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.61 | 36.62 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.16 | 17.07 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement