Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. RGFTX (604M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (2.64) vs CSUCX (0.99). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). CSUCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. RGFTX (5.95). RGFTX return over 5 years is better than : 19.59 vs. CSUCX (18.19).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.91 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.22 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.059 | 9.124 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 604M | 188% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 2.64 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 5.95 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.65 | 37.62 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.19 | 19.59 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement