Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Hold and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. RGFTX (598M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (3.16) vs CSUCX (1.19). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). CSUCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSUCX (10.34) and RGFTX (10.01) have marching annual gain over last year. CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.76 vs. RGFTX (20.59).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.91 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.22 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.591 | 9.244 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 598M | 187% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 3.16 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.34 | 10.01 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.95 | 38.75 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.76 | 20.59 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.74 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement