Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison
Open Charts CSUCX vs RGFTX
CSUCX vs RGFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUCX vs. RGFTX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUCX is a Buy and RGFTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUCX has more cash in the bank: 1.15B vs. RGFTX (586M). RGFTX pays higher dividends than CSUCX: RGFTX (3.16) vs CSUCX (1.19). CSUCX was incepted earlier than RGFTX: CSUCX (22 years) vs RGFTX (9 years). CSUCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than RGFTX (1.22). CSUCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. RGFTX (71.00). CSUCX (0) and RGFTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSUCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.58 vs. RGFTX (6.09). CSUCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.68 vs. RGFTX (17.18).
| CSUCX | RGFTX | CSUCX / RGFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.91 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.22 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.854 | 7.114 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.15B | 586M | 195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 3.16 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.58 | 6.09 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.41 | 35.09 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.68 | 17.18 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement