Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUIX vs FGNCX
CSUIX vs FGNCX Comparison
Open Charts CSUIX vs FGNCX
CSUIX vs FGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUIX vs. FGNCX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUIX is a Hold and FGNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUIX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. FGNCX (549M). CSUIX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: CSUIX (1.92) vs FGNCX (1.27). CSUIX was incepted earlier than FGNCX: CSUIX (22 years) vs FGNCX (18 years). FGNCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CSUIX (0.95). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSUIX (82.00). FGNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSUIX: FGNCX (2500) vs CSUIX (100000). CSUIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.44 vs. FGNCX (-3.68). CSUIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.20 vs. FGNCX (9.47).
| CSUIX | FGNCX | CSUIX / FGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.96 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.08 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.115 | 0.930 | 550% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 549M | 207% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.27 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.44 | -3.68 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.45 | 21.33 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.20 | 9.47 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.22 | 22.81 | 330% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement