Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSUIX vs FGNCX
CSUIX vs FGNCX Comparison
Open Charts CSUIX vs FGNCX
CSUIX vs FGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSUIX vs. FGNCX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSUIX is a Hold and FGNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSUIX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. FGNCX (569M). CSUIX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: CSUIX (1.89) vs FGNCX (1.25). CSUIX was incepted earlier than FGNCX: CSUIX (22 years) vs FGNCX (18 years). FGNCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CSUIX (0.95). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSUIX (82.00). FGNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSUIX: FGNCX (2500) vs CSUIX (100000). CSUIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.93 vs. FGNCX (-1.22). CSUIX return over 5 years is better than : 24.95 vs. FGNCX (13.10).
| CSUIX | FGNCX | CSUIX / FGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.96 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 2.08 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.697 | 4.903 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 569M | 199% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.25 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.93 | -1.22 | -648% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.94 | 27.59 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.95 | 13.10 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.29 | 25.56 | 306% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement