Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSURX vs FGNCX
CSURX vs FGNCX Comparison
Open Charts CSURX vs FGNCX
CSURX vs FGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSURX vs. FGNCX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSURX is a Hold and FGNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSURX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. FGNCX (549M). CSURX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: CSURX (1.39) vs FGNCX (1.27). CSURX was incepted earlier than FGNCX: CSURX (12 years) vs FGNCX (18 years). FGNCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CSURX (1.36). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSURX (82.00). CSURX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: CSURX (0) vs FGNCX (2500). CSURX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.94 vs. FGNCX (-3.68). CSURX return over 5 years is better than : 20.21 vs. FGNCX (9.47).
| CSURX | FGNCX | CSURX / FGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.08 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.726 | 0.930 | 508% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 549M | 207% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.27 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.94 | -3.68 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.54 | 21.33 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | 9.47 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.72 | 22.81 | 293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement