Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSURX vs FGNCX
CSURX vs FGNCX Comparison
Open Charts CSURX vs FGNCX
CSURX vs FGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSURX vs. FGNCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSURX is a Hold and FGNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSURX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. FGNCX (579M). CSURX pays higher dividends than FGNCX: CSURX (1.37) vs FGNCX (1.25). CSURX was incepted earlier than FGNCX: CSURX (12 years) vs FGNCX (18 years). FGNCX (2.08) is less costly to investors than CSURX (1.36). FGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 95.00 vs. CSURX (82.00). CSURX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGNCX: CSURX (0) vs FGNCX (2500). CSURX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. FGNCX (2.21). CSURX return over 5 years is better than : 25.19 vs. FGNCX (16.51).
| CSURX | FGNCX | CSURX / FGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.08 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.115 | 6.593 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 579M | 194% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.25 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 2.21 | 487% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.14 | 23.93 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.19 | 16.51 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.18 | 27.47 | 256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers