It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHRB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSV’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSV (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а +3.11% price change this week, while HRB (@Other Consumer Services) price change was -7.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was -0.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.81%.
CSV is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
HRB is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
CSV | HRB | CSV / HRB | |
Capitalization | 409M | 6.73B | 6% |
EBITDA | 105M | 935M | 11% |
Gain YTD | 4.694 | 9.891 | 47% |
P/E Ratio | 12.39 | 13.39 | 93% |
Revenue | 383M | 3.49B | 11% |
Total Cash | 1.52M | 321M | 0% |
Total Debt | 605M | 2.68B | 23% |
CSV | HRB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSV's Valuation (38) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRB (88). This means that CSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRB’s over the last 12 months.
HRB's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSV (52). This means that HRB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSV’s over the last 12 months.
HRB's SMR Rating (8) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSV (90). This means that HRB’s stock grew significantly faster than CSV’s over the last 12 months.
CSV's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HRB (46). This means that CSV’s stock grew similarly to HRB’s over the last 12 months.
HRB's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as CSV (40). This means that HRB’s stock grew similarly to CSV’s over the last 12 months.
CSV | HRB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago47% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago52% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago45% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 9 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago65% | 2 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago62% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago68% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BBEU | 64.89 | 0.38 | +0.59% |
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF | |||
OMFS | 38.64 | 0.13 | +0.34% |
Invesco Russell 2000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF | |||
FDLS | 28.77 | 0.07 | +0.24% |
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF | |||
PNOV | 37.49 | 0.03 | +0.09% |
Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF Nov | |||
TBX | 28.44 | N/A | N/A |
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSV has been loosely correlated with SCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSV jumps, then SCI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CSV | 100% | +1.27% | ||
SCI - CSV | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
TNL - CSV | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
NCLH - CSV | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
BKNG - CSV | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.80% | ||
FTDR - CSV | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HRB and LIND have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRB and LIND's prices will move in lockstep.