Advertisement
HRB vs SCI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HRB is a Buy and SCI is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HRB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- HRB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SCI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HRB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCI’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HRB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SCI’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HRB (@Personnel Services) experienced а +4.18% price change this week, while SCI (@Personnel Services) price change was +2.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.01%.
Reported Earning Dates
HRB is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.
SCI is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Personnel Services (-1.69% weekly)Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.
| HRB | SCI | HRB / SCI | |
| Capitalization | 5.18B | 11B | 47% |
| EBITDA | 1.05B | 1.32B | 80% |
| Gain YTD | -3.929 | 3.068 | -128% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.31 | 21.01 | 35% |
| Revenue | 3.91B | 4.33B | 90% |
| Total Cash | 867M | 159M | 545% |
| Total Debt | 2.03B | 5.16B | 39% |
HRB | SCI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HRB's Valuation (15) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as SCI (37). This means that HRB’s stock grew similarly to SCI’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRB (66). This means that SCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRB’s over the last 12 months.
HRB's SMR Rating (4) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as SCI (31). This means that HRB’s stock grew similarly to SCI’s over the last 12 months.
HRB's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as SCI (56). This means that HRB’s stock grew similarly to SCI’s over the last 12 months.
SCI's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRB (94). This means that SCI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRB’s over the last 12 months.
| HRB | SCI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 63% | 6 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 34% |
Advertisement
HRB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HRB and LIND have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRB and LIND's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HRB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRB | 100% | +3.21% | ||
| LIND - HRB | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
| CSV - HRB | 26% Poorly correlated | +4.07% | ||
| TNL - HRB | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.60% | ||
| EXPE - HRB | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
| SABR - HRB | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.86% | ||
More | ||||