Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVFX vs HFQRX
CSVFX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CSVFX vs HFQRX
CSVFX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVFX vs. HFQRX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVFX is a Hold and HFQRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 7.92B vs. CSVFX (705M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CSVFX: HFQRX (6.16) vs CSVFX (2.48). CSVFX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CSVFX (26 years) vs HFQRX (11 years). CSVFX (1.03) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.69). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. CSVFX (13.00). CSVFX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.63 vs. HFQRX (26.98). HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 81.03 vs. CSVFX (45.85).
| CSVFX | HFQRX | CSVFX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.69 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.69 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.627 | 19.937 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 705M | 7.92B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 6.16 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.63 | 26.98 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.20 | 79.74 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.85 | 81.03 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.09 | 136.37 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement