Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVFX vs TRIGX
CSVFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts CSVFX vs TRIGX
CSVFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVFX is a Hold and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. CSVFX (705M). CSVFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: CSVFX (2.48) vs TRIGX (2.29). CSVFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: CSVFX (26 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). CSVFX (1.03) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). TRIGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. CSVFX (13.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVFX: TRIGX (2500) vs CSVFX (1000000). CSVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.63 vs. TRIGX (25.78). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 98.24 vs. CSVFX (45.85).
| CSVFX | TRIGX | CSVFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.81 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.81 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.627 | 17.452 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 705M | 17.3B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.29 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.63 | 25.78 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.20 | 96.38 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.85 | 98.24 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.09 | 159.57 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement