Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs FFFMX
CSVZX vs FFFMX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs FFFMX
CSVZX vs FFFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CSVZX (3.07B). FFFMX pays higher dividends than CSVZX: FFFMX (1.70) vs CSVZX (1.34). CSVZX was incepted earlier than FFFMX: CSVZX (16 years) vs FFFMX (6 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). FFFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CSVZX (28.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: FFFMX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.53 vs. FFFMX (10.99). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 57.90 vs. FFFMX (40.88).
| CSVZX | FFFMX | CSVZX / FFFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.32 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.32 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.556 | 6.825 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.07B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.70 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.53 | 10.99 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.27 | 37.62 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.90 | 40.88 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement