Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs FFFMX
CSVZX vs FFFMX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs FFFMX
CSVZX vs FFFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CSVZX (3.16B). FFFMX pays higher dividends than CSVZX: FFFMX (1.68) vs CSVZX (1.31). CSVZX was incepted earlier than FFFMX: CSVZX (16 years) vs FFFMX (6 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). FFFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CSVZX (28.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: FFFMX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.10 vs. FFFMX (9.57). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 61.50 vs. FFFMX (41.56).
| CSVZX | FFFMX | CSVZX / FFFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.32 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.32 | 256% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.681 | 9.487 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.16B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.68 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.10 | 9.57 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.42 | 37.38 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.50 | 41.56 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement