Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs FFMMX
CSVZX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs FFMMX
CSVZX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CSVZX (3.1B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than CSVZX: FFMMX (1.67) vs CSVZX (1.34). CSVZX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: CSVZX (16 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). FFMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CSVZX (28.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: FFMMX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.53 vs. FFMMX (9.92). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 57.90 vs. FFMMX (39.66).
| CSVZX | FFMMX | CSVZX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.36 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.36 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.556 | 6.654 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.1B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.67 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.53 | 9.92 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.27 | 37.31 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.90 | 39.66 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement