Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs FFMMX
CSVZX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs FFMMX
CSVZX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. FFMMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Hold and FFMMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CSVZX (3.24B). FFMMX pays higher dividends than CSVZX: FFMMX (1.63) vs CSVZX (1.26). CSVZX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: CSVZX (16 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). CSVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: FFMMX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.50 vs. FFMMX (5.42). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 69.20 vs. FFMMX (39.64).
| CSVZX | FFMMX | CSVZX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.36 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.36 | 228% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.565 | 8.977 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.24B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.63 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.50 | 5.42 | 433% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.28 | 37.83 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.20 | 39.64 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement