Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RMEBX
CSVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RMEBX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst
Price$40.70
Change+$0.46 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.62
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
CSVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CSVZX (2.53B). CSVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CSVZX (1.65) vs RMEBX (1.09). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CSVZX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CSVZX (0.83). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CSVZX (28.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.06 vs. RMEBX (6.26). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 81.98 vs. RMEBX (62.00).
| CSVZX | RMEBX | CSVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.07 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.07 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.224 | 13.105 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.09 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.06 | 6.26 | 209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.84 | 41.49 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.98 | 62.00 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.80 | 101.70 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement