Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RMEBX
CSVZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RMEBX
CSVZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CSVZX (3.07B). CSVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CSVZX (1.34) vs RMEBX (1.04). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CSVZX (16 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CSVZX (0.82). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CSVZX (28.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RMEBX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.53 vs. RMEBX (10.14). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 57.90 vs. RMEBX (35.62).
| CSVZX | RMEBX | CSVZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.07 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.07 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.556 | 6.444 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.07B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.04 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.53 | 10.14 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.27 | 34.54 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.90 | 35.62 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.83 | 94.57 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement