Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RMFEX
CSVZX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RMFEX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Inst
Price$40.70
Change+$0.46 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.53B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.64
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
CSVZX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CSVZX (2.53B). CSVZX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: CSVZX (1.65) vs RMFEX (1.49). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CSVZX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CSVZX (0.83) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CSVZX (28.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RMFEX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.06 vs. RMFEX (6.73). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 81.98 vs. RMFEX (65.70).
| CSVZX | RMFEX | CSVZX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.62 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.62 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.224 | 13.481 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.49 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.06 | 6.73 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.84 | 43.42 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.98 | 65.70 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.80 | 111.76 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement