Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RMFEX
CSVZX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RMFEX
CSVZX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CSVZX (3.07B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CSVZX: RMFEX (1.45) vs CSVZX (1.34). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CSVZX (16 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CSVZX (28.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RMFEX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.53 vs. RMFEX (10.65). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 57.90 vs. RMFEX (38.72).
| CSVZX | RMFEX | CSVZX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.62 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.62 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.556 | 6.666 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.07B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.45 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.53 | 10.65 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.27 | 36.38 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.90 | 38.72 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.83 | 104.66 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement