Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RMFEX
CSVZX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RMFEX
CSVZX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. CSVZX (3.16B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CSVZX: RMFEX (1.41) vs CSVZX (1.29). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CSVZX (16 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CSVZX (28.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RMFEX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.55 vs. RMFEX (9.45). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 63.16 vs. RMFEX (39.25).
| CSVZX | RMFEX | CSVZX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.62 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.62 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.756 | 9.694 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.16B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.41 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.55 | 9.45 | 302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.54 | 34.42 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.16 | 39.25 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.54 | 100.56 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement