Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RWMHX
CSVZX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RWMHX
CSVZX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RWMHX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Hold and RWMHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CSVZX (3.29B). RWMHX (1.34) and CSVZX (1.29) have matching dividends . CSVZX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: CSVZX (16 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CSVZX (28.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RWMHX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.91 vs. RWMHX (7.41). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 70.52 vs. RWMHX (28.75).
| CSVZX | RWMHX | CSVZX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.41 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.41 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.616 | 6.557 | 314% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.29B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.34 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.91 | 7.41 | 390% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.86 | 33.75 | 201% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.52 | 28.75 | 245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 138.35 | 79.77 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers