Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RWMHX
CSVZX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RWMHX
CSVZX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RWMHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. CSVZX (3.16B). RWMHX (1.34) and CSVZX (1.29) have matching dividends . CSVZX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: CSVZX (16 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RWMHX (29.00) and CSVZX (28.00) have comparable annual turnover. RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RWMHX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.55 vs. RWMHX (6.89). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 63.16 vs. RWMHX (28.22).
| CSVZX | RWMHX | CSVZX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.41 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.41 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.756 | 4.962 | 338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.16B | 219B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.34 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.55 | 6.89 | 415% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.54 | 27.59 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.16 | 28.22 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.54 | 79.60 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement