Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSVZX vs RWMHX
CSVZX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts CSVZX vs RWMHX
CSVZX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSVZX vs. RWMHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSVZX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CSVZX (3.24B). RWMHX pays higher dividends than CSVZX: RWMHX (1.33) vs CSVZX (1.26). CSVZX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: CSVZX (16 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). CSVZX (0.82) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). CSVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RWMHX (32.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSVZX: RWMHX (250) vs CSVZX (2000). CSVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.50 vs. RWMHX (1.96). CSVZX return over 5 years is better than : 69.20 vs. RWMHX (26.83).
| CSVZX | RWMHX | CSVZX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.41 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.41 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.565 | 4.436 | 441% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.24B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.33 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.50 | 1.96 | 1,199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.28 | 29.79 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.20 | 26.83 | 258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.34 | 81.23 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement