CSWC
Price
$22.75
Change
+$0.04 (+0.18%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.07B
33 days until earnings call
GLAD
Price
$27.98
Change
+$0.21 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jul 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
466.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSWC vs GLAD

Header iconCSWC vs GLAD Comparison
Open Charts CSWC vs GLADBanner chart's image
Capital Southwest
Price$22.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.18%)
Volume$13.1K
Capitalization1.07B
Gladstone Capital
Price$27.98
Change+$0.21 (+0.76%)
Volume$1.37K
Capitalization466.85M
CSWC vs GLAD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CSWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWC vs. GLAD commentary
Jul 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWC is a StrongBuy and GLAD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CSWC: $22.74 vs. GLAD: $27.91)
Brand notoriety: CSWC and GLAD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWC: 86% vs. GLAD: 104%
Market capitalization -- CSWC: $1.07B vs. GLAD: $466.85M
CSWC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.07B. GLAD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $466.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGLAD’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GLAD’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CSWC and GLAD are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSWC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLAD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLAD is a better buy in the short-term than CSWC.

Price Growth

CSWC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.90% price change this week, while GLAD (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSWC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

GLAD is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSWC($1.07B) has a higher market cap than GLAD($467M). CSWC has higher P/E ratio than GLAD: CSWC (10.56) vs GLAD (7.34). CSWC YTD gains are higher at: 10.661 vs. GLAD (1.230). GLAD has less debt than CSWC: GLAD (338M) vs CSWC (678M). CSWC has higher revenues than GLAD: CSWC (114M) vs GLAD (74M).
CSWCGLADCSWC / GLAD
Capitalization1.07B467M230%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.6611.230867%
P/E Ratio10.567.34144%
Revenue114M74M154%
Total CashN/A9.33M-
Total Debt678M338M201%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSWC vs GLAD: Fundamental Ratings
CSWC
GLAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2320
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1611
SMR RATING
1..100
2829
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3427
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLAD's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (30) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

GLAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (16) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's SMR Rating (28) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GLAD (29) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GLAD (50) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

GLAD's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (34) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWCGLAD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVFAX76.58N/A
N/A
Smead Value A
LIDOX9.54N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Value F3
MSCUX12.19N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley American Resilience A
ARGYX9.03-0.10
-1.10%
Invesco Global Real Estate Y
CVMCX19.01-0.33
-1.71%
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity C

CSWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSWC has been closely correlated with FSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSWC jumps, then FSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWC
1D Price
Change %
CSWC100%
+0.13%
FSK - CSWC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
MAIN - CSWC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
ARCC - CSWC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
NMFC - CSWC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
BCSF - CSWC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
More

GLAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLAD has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLAD jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAD
1D Price
Change %
GLAD100%
+0.73%
MAIN - GLAD
80%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
FSK - GLAD
80%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
FDUS - GLAD
79%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
ARCC - GLAD
78%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
TSLX - GLAD
75%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
More