CSWC
Price
$22.74
Change
+$0.25 (+1.11%)
Updated
Nov 6, 04:00 PM (EDT)
89 days until earnings call
GLAD
Price
$24.54
Change
+$0.48 (+2.00%)
Updated
Nov 6, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

CSWC vs GLAD

Header iconCSWC vs GLAD Comparison
Open Charts CSWC vs GLADBanner chart's image
Capital Southwest
Price$22.74
Change+$0.25 (+1.11%)
Volume$79.54K
CapitalizationN/A
Gladstone Capital
Price$24.54
Change+$0.48 (+2.00%)
Volume$7.97K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CSWC vs GLAD Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CSWC vs. GLAD commentary
Nov 07, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWC is a Buy and GLAD is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 07, 2024
Stock price -- (CSWC: $22.49 vs. GLAD: $24.06)
Brand notoriety: CSWC and GLAD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWC: 463% vs. GLAD: 67%
Market capitalization -- CSWC: $1.07B vs. GLAD: $466.85M
CSWC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.07B. GLAD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $466.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLAD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLAD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSWC is a better buy in the long-term than GLAD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSWC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLAD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLAD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSWC is a better buy in the short-term than GLAD.

Price Growth

CSWC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -8.13% price change this week, while GLAD (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSWC is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.

GLAD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.51% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSWC($1.07B) has a higher market cap than GLAD($467M). CSWC has higher P/E ratio than GLAD: CSWC (10.56) vs GLAD (7.34). GLAD YTD gains are higher at: 21.061 vs. CSWC (2.335). GLAD has less debt than CSWC: GLAD (338M) vs CSWC (678M). CSWC has higher revenues than GLAD: CSWC (114M) vs GLAD (74M).
CSWCGLADCSWC / GLAD
Capitalization1.07B467M230%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.33521.06111%
P/E Ratio10.567.34144%
Revenue114M74M154%
Total CashN/A9.33M-
Total Debt678M338M201%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSWC vs GLAD: Fundamental Ratings
CSWC
GLAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6180
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2321
SMR RATING
1..100
2628
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4891
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLAD's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (99) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

GLAD's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (23) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's SMR Rating (26) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GLAD (28) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

GLAD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (62) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GLAD’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLAD (91) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLAD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWCGLAD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CSWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMSCX10.920.21
+1.96%
Praxis Small Cap Index A
MITBX38.170.40
+1.06%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr B
WPLCX15.250.16
+1.06%
WP Large Cap Income Plus Institutional
ANDVX11.020.08
+0.73%
Virtus NFJ Dividend Value R6
MSCQX12.15N/A
N/A
Mercer US Small/Mid Cap Equity I

CSWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSWC has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSWC jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWC
1D Price
Change %
CSWC100%
+0.72%
MAIN - CSWC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
ARCC - CSWC
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
PNNT - CSWC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
HTGC - CSWC
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GLAD - CSWC
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More