Advertisement
CSWC vs PFLT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWC is a StrongBuy and PFLT is a Hold.
CSWC | PFLT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 69 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFLT's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSWC (80) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PFLT’s stock grew significantly faster than CSWC’s over the last 12 months.
CSWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for PFLT (100) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew significantly faster than PFLT’s over the last 12 months.
CSWC's SMR Rating (35) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as PFLT (43) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.
CSWC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as PFLT (69) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to PFLT’s over the last 12 months.
PFLT's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (49) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that PFLT’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.
| CSWC | PFLT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 48% | 14 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 56% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSWC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PFLT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CSWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PFLT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSWC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFLT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PFLT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CSWC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while PFLT (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +6.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSWC is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
PFLT is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+6.17% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TNA | 63.89 | 1.01 | +1.61% |
| Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X ETF (TNA) | |||
| PWS | 32.75 | 0.13 | +0.38% |
| Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) | |||
| JAJL | 30.34 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Innovator 6mo Jan/Jul (JAJL) | |||
| BFAP | 15.67 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | |||
| VUSV | 69.96 | -0.05 | -0.08% |
| Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV) | |||
CSWC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSWC has been closely correlated with ARCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSWC jumps, then ARCC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSWC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSWC | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| ARCC - CSWC | 72% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| MAIN - CSWC | 68% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| GLAD - CSWC | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| BXSL - CSWC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| TRIN - CSWC | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
PFLT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFLT has been closely correlated with OCSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFLT jumps, then OCSL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFLT | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| OCSL - PFLT | 71% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| ARCC - PFLT | 71% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| PNNT - PFLT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| CSWC - PFLT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| MFIC - PFLT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
More | ||||