CSWC
Price
$22.29
Change
+$0.31 (+1.41%)
Updated
Jan 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.07B
3 days until earnings call
HTGC
Price
$21.06
Change
+$0.33 (+1.59%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.88B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CSWC vs HTGC

Header iconCSWC vs HTGC Comparison
Open Charts CSWC vs HTGCBanner chart's image
Capital Southwest
Price$22.29
Change+$0.31 (+1.41%)
Volume$5.2K
Capitalization1.07B
Hercules Capital
Price$21.06
Change+$0.33 (+1.59%)
Volume$564.2K
Capitalization2.88B
CSWC vs HTGC Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HTGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWC vs. HTGC commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWC is a Buy and HTGC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (CSWC: $22.32 vs. HTGC: $21.06)
Brand notoriety: CSWC and HTGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWC: 48% vs. HTGC: 62%
Market capitalization -- CSWC: $1.07B vs. HTGC: $2.88B
CSWC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.07B. HTGC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHTGC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HTGC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the long-term than CSWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSWC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTGC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSWC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HTGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTGC is a better buy in the short-term than CSWC.

Price Growth

CSWC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.04% price change this week, while HTGC (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSWC is expected to report earnings on May 26, 2025.

HTGC is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.84% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HTGC($2.88B) has a higher market cap than CSWC($1.07B). CSWC has higher P/E ratio than HTGC: CSWC (10.56) vs HTGC (7.88). HTGC YTD gains are higher at: 4.828 vs. CSWC (2.291). CSWC has less debt than HTGC: CSWC (678M) vs HTGC (1.56B). HTGC has higher revenues than CSWC: HTGC (426M) vs CSWC (114M).
CSWCHTGCCSWC / HTGC
Capitalization1.07B2.88B37%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.2914.82847%
P/E Ratio10.567.88134%
Revenue114M426M27%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt678M1.56B43%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSWC vs HTGC: Fundamental Ratings
CSWC
HTGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2419
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
229
SMR RATING
1..100
2613
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2337
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
506

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HTGC's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSWC (99) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that HTGC’s stock grew significantly faster than CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (22) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (26) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

HTGC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (59) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that HTGC’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as HTGC (37) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to HTGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWCHTGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CSWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HTGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGATX17.190.16
+0.95%
Baillie Gifford Global Alpha Equities 2
FIGSX18.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series International Growth
IGVWX47.13N/A
N/A
Voya Global High Dividend Low Vol W
BCSFX25.78N/A
N/A
Brown Capital Mgmt Intl Sm Co Instl
PAGHX96.51N/A
N/A
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth C

CSWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSWC has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSWC jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSWC
1D Price
Change %
CSWC100%
+1.55%
MAIN - CSWC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
ARCC - CSWC
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
CCAP - CSWC
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
BCSF - CSWC
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
HTGC - CSWC
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
More

HTGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HTGC has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HTGC jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTGC
1D Price
Change %
HTGC100%
+1.59%
MAIN - HTGC
69%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
ARCC - HTGC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
FSK - HTGC
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
CCAP - HTGC
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
CSWC - HTGC
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
More