CTA
Price
$30.29
Change
-$0.79 (-2.54%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FMF
Price
$52.29
Change
+$0.51 (+0.98%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
282.25M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTA vs FMF

CTA vs FMF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 03, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) vs. First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF)

Key Takeaways

  • Both CTA and FMF are actively managed ETFs employing managed futures strategies that seek absolute returns with low correlation to traditional equity and fixed-income markets.
  • CTA features a lower expense ratio of 0.75% compared to FMF at approximately 0.95–0.99%, providing a structural cost advantage for long-term holders.
  • CTA focuses on futures in commodities, currencies, and fixed income while excluding equity futures to enhance diversification, whereas FMF pursues a broader managed futures approach across exchange-listed futures.
  • CTA is a more recent fund (incepted 2022) with larger assets under management, while FMF has a longer track record since 2013 but smaller scale.
  • Both ETFs use synthetic or futures-based structures without direct physical commodity holdings, resulting in similar risk profiles centered on trend-following and volatility in futures markets.
  • Expense efficiency, model sophistication, and correlation characteristics represent the primary differentiators for investors evaluating these two managed futures vehicles.

Introduction

Managed futures strategies have gained attention among investors seeking diversification beyond traditional asset classes amid shifting macroeconomic conditions. CTA and FMF do not compete directly with equity or bond ETFs but instead offer alternative exposure through systematic trend-following in futures markets. They target similar investor goals of absolute returns and downside protection during equity drawdowns, making them relevant alternatives within the managed futures category rather than direct substitutes.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) Overview

The Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) is an actively managed fund launched in March 2022 that seeks long-term capital appreciation through long and short positions in commodity, currency, and fixed-income futures contracts. It employs systematic models developed by Altis Partners, a commodity trading advisor, and typically avoids direct equity futures to maintain low correlations with equity-dominated portfolios. The fund holds no underlying index and uses a synthetic replication approach via futures. It maintains an expense ratio of 0.75%. Key structural features include quarterly distributions and a Cayman Islands subsidiary for certain exposures. The strategy emphasizes absolute returns and risk management during market stress.

First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) Overview

The First Trust Managed Futures Strategy Fund (FMF) is an actively managed ETF launched in August 2013 that aims to deliver positive returns uncorrelated with broad equity or fixed-income markets. It invests in a portfolio of exchange-listed futures contracts, with flexibility in contract selection and rolls to potentially outperform a benchmark. The fund follows no specific index and uses an active management style with a synthetic futures-based structure. It carries an expense ratio of approximately 0.95–0.99%. The strategy focuses on achieving absolute-return performance through managed futures exposure across various asset classes.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The managed futures sector operates within the broader alternatives and hedge-fund replication space, driven by trends in commodities, interest rates, and currencies. Macroeconomic factors such as inflation dynamics, central bank policy shifts, and geopolitical events influence futures price trends that these strategies seek to capture. Regulatory developments around derivatives and commodity trading advisors continue to shape product structures, while investor demand for low-correlation assets supports capital allocation to the category during periods of equity market uncertainty.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited volatility tied to commodity and interest-rate trends rather than equity movements. CTA’s exclusion of equity futures and lower cost base may support more consistent positioning during risk-off environments, while FMF’s longer history allows observation of behavior across multiple economic regimes. Relative performance differences often stem from model variations in trend detection and futures roll strategies, with both funds showing sensitivity to sector rotation in commodities and shifts in interest-rate expectations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to CTA due to its lower expense ratio, larger scale, and explicit exclusion of equity futures that may enhance diversification consistency. FMF remains competitive through its established track record and active flexibility, though higher costs represent a relative headwind in prolonged holding periods.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CTA vs. FMF commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTA is a Buy and FMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTA has more net assets: 1.65B vs. FMF (282M). CTA has a higher annual dividend yield than FMF: CTA (15.445) vs FMF (12.074). CTA was incepted earlier than FMF: CTA (5 years) vs FMF (13 years). CTA (0.75) has a lower expense ratio than FMF (0.98). FMF has a higher turnover CTA (0.00) vs CTA (0.00).
CTAFMFCTA / FMF
Gain YTD15.44512.074128%
Net Assets1.65B282M585%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.9877%
Turnover0.0010.00-
Yield5.264.94106%
Fund Existence5 years13 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTAFMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
CTA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOPAX31.11N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy A
BABDX11.92N/A
N/A
BlackRock Global Dividend Inv A
RTDYX14.81N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Multifactor US Equity Y
TSRMX20.42N/A
N/A
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr R6
CFMVX27.55N/A
N/A
Commerce MidCap Value