CTA
Price
$30.29
Change
-$0.79 (-2.54%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IMF
Price
$53.77
Change
+$0.15 (+0.28%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
323M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTA vs IMF

CTA vs IMF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 03, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) vs. Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF)

Key Takeaways

  • Both CTA and IMF are actively managed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) employing managed futures strategies with long and short positions across global futures markets including equities, fixed income, commodities, and currencies.
  • CTA (Simplify) features a 0.75% expense ratio and larger assets under management, while IMF (Invesco) offers a lower 0.65% expense ratio in a more recently launched vehicle.
  • Structural exposure profiles are closely aligned, with each fund using derivatives and subsidiaries to access trend-following opportunities without direct commodity holdings in many cases.
  • Diversification benefits stem from low correlation to traditional equity and bond markets, positioning both as potential hedges during periods of market stress or trend-driven environments.
  • Cost efficiency and fund scale represent primary differentiators, influencing liquidity and accessibility for investors seeking alternative exposure.
  • Neither tracks a traditional benchmark index; both rely on systematic or quantitative models for position selection and rebalancing.

Introduction

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) provide investors with access to managed futures strategies that aim to deliver returns with low correlation to conventional asset classes. These ETFs do not compete directly with equity or fixed-income products but serve as alternatives within the systematic trend category, targeting similar goals of capital appreciation through long and short futures positions. The comparison highlights structural nuances, cost structures, and positioning in an environment where trend-following approaches may respond to macroeconomic volatility and sector rotations.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) Overview

The Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) is an actively managed ETF launched in March 2022 that seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic long and short positions in equity, U.S. Treasury, commodity, and foreign exchange futures contracts. It typically gains exposure via a Cayman Islands subsidiary rather than holding futures directly. The fund maintains an expense ratio of 0.75% and does not track a specific index. Holdings primarily consist of government money market instruments and various futures contracts, supporting a rules-based trend-following methodology developed in partnership with a commodity trading advisor. This structure emphasizes liquidity and transparency in an open-ended fund format.

Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) Overview

The Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) is an actively managed ETF launched in March 2025 that pursues its objective by taking long and short positions in derivative contracts linked to over fifty global markets, including stock indices, bond indices, commodity indices, and currencies. Exposure is achieved through futures, forwards, and swaps, often via a subsidiary structure. The fund carries a net expense ratio of 0.65% and follows a non-diversified mandate without reference to a benchmark index. Portfolio construction relies on quantitative models to identify trends across asset classes, with holdings reflecting synthetic positions in treasury notes, bonds, and related instruments.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Managed futures strategies operate within the alternatives space, responding to macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate cycles, commodity price trends, geopolitical events, and shifts in global growth expectations. Capital flows into trend-following vehicles often increase during periods of elevated volatility or when traditional correlations break down. Regulatory developments around derivatives usage and tax treatment of futures income continue to shape accessibility, while sector risks include model underperformance in choppy, range-bound markets and potential liquidity constraints in certain futures contracts during stress events.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited behavior consistent with trend-following mandates, capturing momentum in rising or falling markets across commodities, currencies, and fixed income. Relative positioning highlights differences in scale, with the larger, more established CTA potentially offering tighter bid-ask spreads and greater capacity. IMF’s lower expense ratio may support modestly improved net returns over longer horizons, assuming similar gross performance. Volatility profiles remain comparable due to overlapping exposure universes, though differences in rebalancing frequency and model parameters could influence sensitivity to specific macro shifts such as commodity rallies or currency movements.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest edge to Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF (IMF) based on its lower expense ratio and comparable structural features, which could enhance cost efficiency over time while maintaining similar exposure and trend-capture characteristics. The larger scale of Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) provides advantages in liquidity and track record length, supporting its suitability for investors prioritizing capacity. Selection ultimately depends on individual preferences for cost versus established operational history within the managed futures category.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CTA vs. IMF commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTA is a Buy and IMF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTA has more net assets: 1.65B vs. IMF (323M). IMF has a higher annual dividend yield than CTA: IMF (17.540) vs CTA (15.445). CTA was incepted earlier than IMF: CTA (5 years) vs IMF (1 year). IMF (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CTA (0.75).
CTAIMFCTA / IMF
Gain YTD15.44517.54088%
Net Assets1.65B323M511%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.65115%
Turnover0.00N/A-
Yield5.260.88601%
Fund Existence5 years1 year-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTAIMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
CTA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTAPX14.270.08
+0.56%
Glenmede Long/Short Eq Ptf
DGFAX32.680.10
+0.31%
Davis Global A
MINVX29.53N/A
N/A
Madison Large Cap Y
VTSIX115.90N/A
N/A
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small Cap I
SPMWX10.95N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 R