CTA
Price
$30.77
Change
+$0.73 (+2.43%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Net Assets
1.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KMLM
Price
$31.04
Change
+$0.56 (+1.84%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Net Assets
595.97M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTA vs KMLM

CTA vs KMLM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) vs. KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF (KMLM)

Key Takeaways

  • Both CTA and KMLM are managed futures ETFs that seek to deliver returns through long and short positions in futures contracts across commodities, currencies, and fixed income, offering potential diversification from traditional equity and bond portfolios.
  • CTA employs an active, systematic trend-following strategy with exposure to equity futures in addition to other asset classes, while KMLM follows a passive index tracking 22 liquid futures contracts limited to commodities, currencies, and global bonds.
  • CTA carries a lower expense ratio of 0.75% compared to KMLM at 0.90%, which may influence long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • Structural differences include CTA’s use of a Cayman Islands subsidiary for futures exposure and its active management style versus KMLM’s index-based approach with equal-dollar weighting within volatility-adjusted baskets.
  • Both funds target absolute returns with low correlation to equities, positioning them as potential hedges during equity market stress or periods of commodity and currency volatility.
  • Liquidity and holdings profiles differ, with CTA maintaining a smaller number of concentrated futures positions and KMLM providing broader index-driven diversification across 22 contracts.

Introduction

Managed futures strategies have gained attention among investors seeking alternatives that can perform across varying market regimes. CTA and KMLM represent two distinct implementations of this approach. They do not compete directly as core equity or bond holdings but instead offer complementary exposure within the alternatives category. Investors evaluating trend-following or commodity-linked strategies often compare these funds when assessing portfolio diversification, risk mitigation, and cost structures in the current macroeconomic environment.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) Overview

The Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in March 2022. It seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic long and short positions in equity, U.S. Treasury, commodity, and foreign exchange futures contracts. The fund typically gains exposure via a wholly owned Cayman Islands subsidiary. CTA maintains a modest number of holdings focused on futures contracts rather than individual securities. Its expense ratio stands at 0.75%. The strategy relies on price trend signals and does not track a traditional benchmark index, distinguishing it as a systematic trend-following vehicle within the managed futures space.

KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) Overview

The KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) is a passively managed fund launched in December 2020 that tracks the KFA MLM Index. The index comprises 22 liquid futures contracts across 11 commodities, 6 currencies, and 5 global bond markets, with baskets weighted by historical volatility and constituents equal-dollar weighted within each basket. KMLM does not include equity futures exposure. The fund’s expense ratio is 0.90%. It emphasizes total return through trend signals applied to the underlying futures without direct equity market correlation, positioning it as an index-driven managed futures solution.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Managed futures ETFs operate within the alternatives sector, providing exposure to futures markets that can benefit from price trends in commodities, currencies, and fixed income. Current macroeconomic drivers include ongoing commodity price fluctuations, shifting interest rate expectations, and geopolitical developments affecting currency and energy markets. Capital flows into trend-following strategies often increase during periods of elevated volatility or when traditional asset correlations rise. Regulatory considerations around futures trading and margin requirements remain stable, while sector risks center on the potential for prolonged non-trending markets that can pressure returns in both active and index-based approaches.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited behavior tied to commodity trends, currency movements, and interest rate shifts rather than equity performance. CTA’s inclusion of equity futures may introduce modest additional volatility during equity rotations, while KMLM’s exclusion of equities supports a more consistent low-correlation profile. Relative positioning favors diversification benefits in environments with strong commodity or currency trends, with performance differences arising primarily from active versus index methodologies and the scope of futures markets accessed. Both funds have demonstrated resilience across broader timeframes encompassing varying volatility regimes.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking to compare managed futures ETFs or explore similar alternatives may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to CTA due to its lower expense ratio, active trend-following flexibility, and broader futures market access that includes equities. KMLM offers competitive index transparency and a narrower, equity-uncorrelated mandate that may appeal in specific diversification scenarios. The choice ultimately depends on investor preferences for cost efficiency versus strict index adherence and equity exposure limits.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CTA vs. KMLM commentary
Oct 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTA is a Buy and KMLM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for CTA with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

CTA sees its 50-day moving average cross bullishly above its 200-day moving average

The 50-day moving average for CTA moved above the 200-day moving average on October 07, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CTA as a result. In 68 of 77 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CTA just turned positive on October 13, 2026. Looking at past instances where CTA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 43 of 51 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

Following a +2.84% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CTA advanced for three days, in 275 of 315 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 199 of 220 cases where CTA Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CTA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.

CTA broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for KMLM with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

KMLM sees MACD Histogram just turned negative

KMLM saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on September 22, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 41 of the 50 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 82%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for KMLM moved out of overbought territory on October 08, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 38 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 30 of the 38 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 79%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where KMLM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 23, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on KMLM as a result. In 68 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

Following a +1.07% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where KMLM advanced for three days, in 284 of 356 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.

KMLM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 244 of 283 cases where KMLM Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 86%.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTAKMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
CTA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KMLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INTJ3.190.19
+6.33%
Intelligent Group Limited
CLLS0.98N/A
+0.51%
Cellectis SA
BOH70.600.34
+0.48%
Bank of Hawaii Corp
SWK99.240.27
+0.27%
Stanley Black & Decker
BWMX15.59-0.39
-2.44%
Betterware de Mexico SAPI de CV

CTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTA and CASH have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTA and CASH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTA
1D Price
Change %
CTA100%
+2.43%
CASH - CTA
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%