CTA
Price
$30.29
Change
-$0.79 (-2.54%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
1.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KMLM
Price
$31.01
Change
-$0.10 (-0.32%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
489.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTA vs KMLM

CTA vs KMLM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 03, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) vs. KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF (KMLM)

Key Takeaways

  • Both CTA and KMLM are managed futures ETFs that seek absolute returns with low equity correlation through systematic long/short exposure to commodities, currencies, and fixed income futures.
  • CTA employs an active strategy with models from Altis Partners and carries a lower expense ratio of 0.75%, while KMLM is passively benchmarked to the KFA MLM Index with an expense ratio of 0.90%.
  • Neither ETF holds individual stocks or equity futures, resulting in distinct risk profiles focused on trend-following across futures markets rather than traditional equity or bond sector allocations.
  • CTA utilizes a Cayman Islands subsidiary for futures exposure, whereas KMLM directly targets 22 liquid futures contracts across 11 commodities, 6 currencies, and 5 global bond markets.
  • Structural differences in management style and index methodology influence diversification, rebalancing frequency, and potential responsiveness to macroeconomic shifts in commodity and interest rate trends.
  • Both funds appeal to investors seeking portfolio diversification beyond conventional asset classes, with positioning sensitive to broader trends in global growth, inflation, and monetary policy.

Introduction

Managed futures strategies have gained attention as tools for diversification amid evolving macroeconomic conditions. CTA and KMLM represent two approaches within this category, both targeting systematic exposure to futures markets without direct equity holdings. They do not compete directly in the same index but offer alternative implementations of trend-following methodologies aimed at similar investor objectives of low-correlation returns and downside risk management during risk-off periods.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) Overview

The Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) is an actively managed fund issued by Simplify Asset Management. It seeks long-term capital appreciation through systematic long and short positions in commodity, currency, and fixed income futures contracts, guided by price trend models developed in partnership with Altis Partners. The strategy excludes equity futures to maintain low correlations with equity markets. CTA uses a Cayman Islands subsidiary for certain exposures and reports an expense ratio of 0.75%. It does not track a traditional index and features a synthetic replication approach with no Schedule K-1 tax reporting for investors.

KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) Overview

The KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) is a passively managed fund issued by KraneShares that seeks to track the performance of the KFA MLM Index before fees and expenses. The index comprises 22 liquid futures contracts across 11 commodities, 6 currencies, and 5 global bond markets, with volatility-based weighting across baskets and equal-dollar weighting within each. Sub-advised by Mount Lucas Management, the ETF maintains exposure through direct and indirect futures positions and reports an expense ratio of 0.90%. It features quarterly distributions and avoids equity futures for reduced correlation to stock market movements.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Managed futures ETFs operate within the alternatives category, providing exposure to global commodity, currency, and fixed income futures markets. Key macroeconomic drivers include commodity price trends influenced by supply disruptions, energy transitions, and agricultural yields, alongside currency fluctuations tied to interest rate differentials and geopolitical events. Fixed income futures respond to monetary policy expectations and inflation dynamics. Sector risks encompass volatility in futures roll yields, liquidity variations across contract types, and potential regulatory changes affecting derivatives trading. Capital flows into these strategies often increase during periods of elevated equity or bond market uncertainty as investors seek uncorrelated return sources.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited performance patterns driven by trend persistence in commodity and rates markets rather than equity earnings seasons. CTA’s active model suite may allow quicker adaptation to shifting futures trends, while KMLM’s rules-based index approach delivers consistent volatility-weighted exposure. Relative positioning differences arise from active versus passive implementation, influencing responsiveness to interest rate expectations and commodity momentum. Volatility profiles remain distinct from traditional equity or sector ETFs, with both funds showing potential resilience during broad risk-off moves but sensitivity to choppy, non-trending futures environments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener for advanced filtering capabilities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to CTA due to its lower expense ratio, active trend-model flexibility, and established diversification characteristics within the managed futures space. KMLM offers transparent index tracking and broad futures coverage that may suit investors prioritizing rules-based consistency. Selection ultimately depends on individual risk tolerance, cost sensitivity, and alignment with specific trend-following objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CTA vs. KMLM commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTA is a Buy and KMLM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTA has more net assets: 1.65B vs. KMLM (489M). KMLM has a higher annual dividend yield than CTA: KMLM (19.499) vs CTA (15.445). CTA was incepted earlier than KMLM: CTA (5 years) vs KMLM (6 years). CTA (0.75) has a lower expense ratio than KMLM (0.90).
CTAKMLMCTA / KMLM
Gain YTD15.44519.49979%
Net Assets1.65B489M337%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.9083%
Turnover0.00N/A-
Yield5.264.38120%
Fund Existence5 years6 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTAKMLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
CTA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KMLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SNTKX30.80N/A
N/A
Steward Values Enhanced International A
FFARX18.36N/A
N/A
Franklin Global Allocation R
CCCRX42.14N/A
N/A
Columbia Contrarian Core R
FSKGX19.19N/A
N/A
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6
STRBX23.86N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq R6