Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs FSMAX
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$15.12
Change+$0.22 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.36M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.17
Change+$1.25 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. CTAGX (31.4M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTAGX (2.53) vs FSMAX (0.50). CTAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTAGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.85 vs. FSMAX (14.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.38 vs. CTAGX (44.88).
| CTAGX | FSMAX | CTAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.04 | 3,857% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.093 | 0.044 | 4,756% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.4M | 37.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 0.50 | 507% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.85 | 14.57 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.71 | 43.69 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.88 | 64.38 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.79 | - |