Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
CTAGX vs FSMAX
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$15.35
Change-$0.29 (-1.85%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.50
Change-$1.21 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40B vs. CTAGX (28.7M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CTAGX: FSMAX (1.10) vs CTAGX (0.00). CTAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTAGX (5 years) vs FSMAX (13 years). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 231.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.76 vs. FSMAX (35.21). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 63.82 vs. FSMAX (51.19).
| CTAGX | FSMAX | CTAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 45.222 | 18.499 | 244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.7M | 40B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.76 | 35.21 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.13 | -0.08 | 21,398% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.82 | 51.19 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...