Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs FSMAX
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$17.19
Change-$0.25 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.09M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$100.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.44B
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. CTAGX (36.1M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTAGX (2.15) vs FSMAX (0.44). CTAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTAGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.53 vs. FSMAX (12.72). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.84 vs. CTAGX (32.19).
| CTAGX | FSMAX | CTAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.04 | 3,857% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.070 | 10.860 | 148% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.1M | 41.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 0.44 | 494% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.53 | 12.72 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.94 | 63.57 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.19 | 48.84 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement