Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs FSMAX
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$14.88
Change+$0.06 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.32M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.47
Change+$0.80 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. CTAGX (31.3M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTAGX (2.40) vs FSMAX (0.47). CTAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTAGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.32 vs. FSMAX (8.54). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 56.52 vs. CTAGX (34.05).
| CTAGX | FSMAX | CTAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.04 | 3,857% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.473 | 3.070 | 15% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.3M | 39.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 0.47 | 506% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.32 | 8.54 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.93 | 51.26 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.05 | 56.52 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement