Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs FSMAX
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$16.65
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.25M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.78
Change+$0.13 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.46B
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.5B vs. CTAGX (35.3M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: CTAGX (2.07) vs FSMAX (0.43). CTAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTAGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FSMAX (15.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.24 vs. FSMAX (4.46). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.47 vs. CTAGX (28.52).
| CTAGX | FSMAX | CTAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.04 | 3,857% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.04 | 5,171% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.424 | 6.349 | 196% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 35.3M | 41.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 0.43 | 482% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.24 | 4.46 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.09 | 49.71 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.52 | 33.47 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 93.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement