Ad is loading...
CTAGX vs FSMAX
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs FSMAX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$14.34
Change-$0.67 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.38M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$91.19
Change-$2.88 (-3.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.92B
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a StrongBuy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. CTAGX (32.4M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CTAGX: FSMAX (1.10) vs CTAGX (0.00). CTAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTAGX (6 years) vs FSMAX (13 years). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 231.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.69 vs. FSMAX (15.39). FSMAX (41.45) and CTAGX (40.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CTAGX | FSMAX | CTAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.174 | 0.341 | -930% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.4M | 41.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.69 | 15.39 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.39 | 24.35 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.29 | 41.45 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.15 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...