Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs FSMAX
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs FSMAX
CTAGX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. CTAGX (50.5M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than CTAGX: FSMAX (0.50) vs CTAGX (0.00). CTAGX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: CTAGX (7 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). CTAGX (1.70) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 192.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CTAGX: FSMAX (0) vs CTAGX (2500). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 52.38 vs. FSMAX (30.16). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 42.61 vs. FSMAX (35.11).
| CTAGX | FSMAX | CTAGX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.04 | 3,857% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.04 | 4,857% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.072 | 14.403 | 202% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.5M | 42.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 52.38 | 30.16 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 117.97 | 67.22 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.61 | 35.11 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 147.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement