Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs RPMGX
CTAGX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs RPMGX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$17.19
Change-$0.25 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.09M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.19
Change+$0.29 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.14B
CTAGX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. RPMGX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. CTAGX (36.1M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than RPMGX: CTAGX (2.15) vs RPMGX (0.00). CTAGX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: CTAGX (6 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). CTAGX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.53 vs. RPMGX (-7.46). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 32.19 vs. RPMGX (-4.20).
| CTAGX | RPMGX | CTAGX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.75 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.75 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.070 | 2.467 | 651% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.1M | 26.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.53 | -7.46 | -302% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.94 | 18.94 | 417% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.19 | -4.20 | -767% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement