Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs RPMGX
CTAGX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs RPMGX
CTAGX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a StrongBuy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. CTAGX (45.4M). CTAGX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . CTAGX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: CTAGX (7 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). CTAGX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 192.00 vs. RPMGX (31.50). CTAGX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.22 vs. RPMGX (-6.56). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 17.18 vs. RPMGX (-24.68).
| CTAGX | RPMGX | CTAGX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.77 | 175% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.77 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.470 | -0.051 | -30,089% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4M | 21.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.22 | -6.56 | -247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.81 | -1.58 | -6,318% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.18 | -24.68 | -70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement