Ad is loading...
CTAGX vs VEXPX
CTAGX vs VEXPX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs VEXPX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$12.31
Change-$0.59 (-4.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.51M
CTAGX vs VEXPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. VEXPX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a StrongBuy and VEXPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEXPX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. CTAGX (29.5M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than VEXPX: CTAGX (2.62) vs VEXPX (0.41). CTAGX was incepted earlier than VEXPX: CTAGX (6 years) vs VEXPX (57 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VEXPX (0.45). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. VEXPX (35.00). CTAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEXPX: CTAGX (2500) vs VEXPX (3000). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.88 vs. VEXPX (-7.52). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 57.12 vs. VEXPX (29.83).
| CTAGX | VEXPX | CTAGX / VEXPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.45 | 300% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.45 | 402% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 57 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.897 | -6.420 | 201% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.5M | 21.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 0.41 | 644% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | -7.52 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.93 | -0.83 | -2,039% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.12 | 29.83 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.21 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...