Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CTAGX vs VEXPX
CTAGX vs VEXPX Comparison
Open Charts CTAGX vs VEXPX
Calamos Timpani SMID Growth A
Price$14.88
Change+$0.06 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.32M
CTAGX vs VEXPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CTAGX vs. VEXPX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTAGX is a Hold and VEXPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VEXPX has more cash in the bank: 20.1B vs. CTAGX (31.3M). CTAGX pays higher dividends than VEXPX: CTAGX (2.40) vs VEXPX (0.40). CTAGX was incepted earlier than VEXPX: CTAGX (6 years) vs VEXPX (58 years). CTAGX (1.81) is less costly to investors than VEXPX (0.44). CTAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. VEXPX (35.00). CTAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than VEXPX: CTAGX (2500) vs VEXPX (3000). CTAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.32 vs. VEXPX (-6.93). CTAGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.05 vs. VEXPX (8.26).
| CTAGX | VEXPX | CTAGX / VEXPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.44 | 307% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.44 | 411% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 58 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.473 | -1.462 | -32% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 31.3M | 20.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 0.40 | 593% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.32 | -6.93 | -178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.93 | 17.90 | 329% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.05 | 8.26 | 412% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement